Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Kimberly Birrell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Birrell analysis and find out who is favored!
Maddison Inglis vs Kimberly Birrell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Inglis 2 - 3 Birrell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 46.41% of points on his second serve, while Birrell has won 41.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 55.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Birrell has won 51.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.38% and 39.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 57.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Birrell has saved 49.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 35/ 25), with Birrell winning 49.18% (W/L 30/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 143/ 113), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.38% of matches (W/L 32/ 21), where as Birrell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 20/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Inglis winning 2 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Inglis winning 6 and Birrell winning 7. The last match between Inglis and Birrell was at the W100 Tokyo, 26-04-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Birrell have played a deciding set 3 times, with Inglis winning 1 times and Birrell 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 3, and Birrell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.48 while Birrell has played against players with an average rank of 200.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Birrell has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 48.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Birrell has converted 43.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Inglis 2 - 3 Birrell
226
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total3
2
Hard3
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
182
Rank
100
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
59% (249-174)
Career Total W/L
53% (188-168)
67% (18-9)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$446,328
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 7 |
| Games Won | 63 | 69 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 27 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:24 | 1:51:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (214/368) | 60% (206/344) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (127/214) | 61% (126/206) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (73/154) | 49% (68/138) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (15/34) | 40% (19/47) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (150/344) | 46% (168/368) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
50 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
59%
(
71 of
120)
1st Serve %
47%
(
53 of
113)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
13
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
56 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (18/9) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (42/23) | 47% (22/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (343/268) | 48% (222/238) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 27% (3/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 95 | 35 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 121 | 95 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:26 | 1:58:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 302.22 | 172.05 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1152/1901) | 63% (930/1467) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (767/1152) | 61% (563/930) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (348/749) | 43% (233/537) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (123/259) | 41% (78/188) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (952/2040) | 43% (629/1448) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 70% (16/7) | 54% (7/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (18/27) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 20% (10/2) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Maddison Inglis
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Maddison Inglis
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
13
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
31%
(
17 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Stacey Fung
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Yexin Ma
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arina Rodionova
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kyoka Okamura
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Ayano Shimizu
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Aoi Ito
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
En Shuo Liang
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Kimberly Birrell
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Haruka Kaji
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Kimberly Birrell
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Inglis Vs Birrell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
